Get HUD Exchange Updates: Get critical deadlines, policy changes, and upcoming trainings in your inbox.

Reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA)

August 30, 2013 Print ShareThis

The Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs (SNAPS) would like to bring your attention to a recent HUD Federal Register Notice on the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013 (“VAWA 2013”) and the new housing protections in that law that will have implications for HUD’s Homeless Assistance Program recipients. Please share your comments with us at, no later than October 7, 2013.

VAWA 2013 was signed into law on March 7th, 2013. Here are some of the key changes related to housing:

  • VAWA 2013 maintains protections for public housing, Section 8 vouchers, and project based Section 8, and also expands the housing protections from VAWA 2005 to include the following programs which includes HUD’s Homeless Assistance Programs:
    • HOME Investment Partnerships program
    • § 202 supportive housing for the elderly
    • Section 236 Rental Program
    • § 811 supportive housing for people with disabilities
    • Section 221(d)(3) Below Market Interest Rate (BMIR) Program
    • HOPWA housing program
    • HUD’s McKinney-Vento homeless programs
    • Low-Income Housing Tax Credit properties
    • USDA Rural Housing properties
  • VAWA 2013 continues to bar eviction and termination due to a tenant’s status as a survivor, and requires landlords to maintain survivor-tenant confidentiality. It also continues to prohibit a tenant who is a survivor of domestic violence from being denied assistance, tenancy, or occupancy rights based solely on criminal activity related to an act of domestic violence committed against them.
  • VAWA 2013 now expressly extends housing protections to survivors of sexual assault, and adds “intimate partner” to the list of eligible relationships in the domestic violence definition. Protections also now cover an “affiliated individual,” which includes any person living with the survivor and related to him or her by blood or marriage including the survivor’s spouse, parent, brother, sister, child, or any person to whom the survivor stands in loco parentis.
  • It continues to allow a lease bifurcation so a tenant or lawful occupant who engages in criminal acts of physical violence against affiliated individuals or others may be evicted or removed without evicting or removing or otherwise penalizing a victim who is a tenant or lawful occupant. If victim cannot establish eligibility, the landlord must give a reasonable amount of time to find new housing or establish eligibility under another covered housing program.
  • New housing protections in VAWA 2013 includes the requirement that each appropriate agency develop a notice of rights under VAWA for tenants and provide such notice at the time a person applies for housing, when a person is admitted as a tenant of a housing unit, and when a tenant is threatened with eviction or termination of housing benefits.
  • VAWA 2013 requires each appropriate agency to adopt a model transfer plan for use by public housing agencies and owners or managers of housing. Tenants must request a transfer and reasonably believe that they are threatened with imminent harm from further violence if the tenant remains in the same unit.

While HUD is developing regulations to codify these important protections for HUD-covered programs and to provide guidance on such statutory provisions as “reasonable time”, and “notice of rights,” housing providers in HUD-covered programs should not wait on HUD regulations to extend the basic VAWA protections (e.g., no eviction or termination to survivors of domestic violence) to tenants residing in HUD-assisted housing. Furthermore, we would like to take this opportunity to remind you that certain policies and practices that treat victims of domestic violence different from other tenants may be considered to be discrimination on the basis of sex under the federal Fair Housing Act.

If a housing provider refuses to rent, evicts, or otherwise treats someone differently because of that person’s status as a victim of domestic violence, HUD or the courts may find a violation under the Fair Housing Act due to direct discrimination, unequal treatment, or disparate impact. If a jurisdiction or other entity encourages or causes differential treatment toward domestic violence victims, that jurisdiction or entity could encounter liability. For these reasons, we encourage you to review the HUD Federal Register Notice and HUD’s 2011 guidance on domestic violence and fair housing. (Please note that the 2011 guidance covers protections under the Fair Housing Act and under VAWA 2005 but has not yet been updated to include the protections under VAWA 2013).

If you have any questions, please contact your local CPD field office.